Green Referendum for Mexico City

Article Photoby Adrian Muller Mexico City is one of the world’s largest metropolitan areas, home to nearly 21 million inhabitants. About four million cars travel every day through the city, causing serious pollution and congestion problems. Mexico City’s Major Marcelo Ebrard, who goes to work on a bike at least once a month, is committed to adopting and adhering to environmentally friendly practices to improve the sustainability of the city. Mr. Ebrard recently joined other leaders of the world’s largest cities and CEOs of international corporations to pursue joint efforts to combat global warming while ensuring economic benefits for cities. The occasion was the C40 Large Cities Summit, a gathering of Mayors dedicated to reducing carbon emissions and to developing infrastructure that encourages more efficient use of energy. His objective was securing $ 200 millions of external funding from Bill Clinton’s recently crated Energy Efficiency Building Retrofit Program. The Program aims to reduce carbon emissions by outfitting city-owned buildings with green technology. Under the umbrella of the Clinton Climate Initiative (CCI), 16 cities around the world (among them, Mexico City) will receive more than $1 billion worth of financing for renovation projects such as: making roofs white or reflective to deflect… (more)

(Posted by WorldChanging Team in Worldchanging Guests at 7:14 PM)

Principle 17: Environmental Justice

The history of industrialization involves a long, ugly series of civil injustices through the environmental degradation of communities at the receiving end of industrial waste streams. It’s no coincidence that huge manufacturing plants dispose of their byproducts where people have the least power, money and influence to fight back. As a result, these communities have suffered disproportionate health problems and dealt with substandard environmental conditions for decades, while having the least access to the resources industry both exploits and provides. During the same period, the environmental movement has grown and become known (at least early on) more for its vehement advocacy for whales and rainforests than for disenfranchised citizens; that was presumed to be the work of the civil rights and social justice movements. More recently, though, it’s become glaringly obvious that these movements are inextricably linked — that environmental degradation is a civil injustice — and from the junction of the two, the environmental justice movement has emerged. Environmental justice defines environment to include communities, human health and racial equality in equal proportion to resource depletion, pollution, extinction, and the numerous other issues associated with environmentalism. Not surprisingly, many of the initiatives towards achieving environmental justice have sprouted within… (more)

(Posted by WorldChanging Team in Community at 6:43 PM)

Toyota FT-HS looks set to be new Supra with hybrid for power not efficiency

Filed under: ,


Click on the photo for a high-res gallery of the FT-HS concept

It looks like the Toyota FT-HS hybrid sports car concept that appeared at the Detroit Auto Show may become a reality to compete with Nissan 350Z. The problem is it’s looking like Toyota is primarily using the hybrid system as means of improving performance rather than efficiency. Apparently Toyota will offer two versions of the car, the base model using a 330hp version of their 3.5L V-6 to match the Z, and a higher performance 400hp version with the hybrid powertrain.

Although the hybrid version is probably more efficient than a comparable 400hp conventional drivetrain, if Toyota is serious about being an environmental leader they would say the 330hp (or less) is enough and do a hybrid with a smaller ICE and better efficiency and emissions than the Nissan at comparable performance levels. But even mighty Toyota is susceptible to the schizophrenia (I know it is surely the wrong medical term, but most people will get my meaning) that afflicts most carmakers who want to be seen as green while still appealing to as large and as profitable a customer base as possible.

[Source: Winding Road]

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


BOLD MOVES: THE FUTURE OF FORD Step behind the curtain at Ford Motor. Experience the documentary first-hand.

Panic? Who said panic? Gas prices aren’t yet that high.

Filed under:

Politicians may be frenzy about gas prices and may wish to create laws to control price gouging and blame the OPEC for the high gas prices. However Jerry Taylor, senior fellow at the Cato Institute, argues that American fuel consumption hasn’t been affected by rising prices — and won’t be — since gas remains inexpensive compared to historic highs.

“Maybe symbolic blather is the best we can hope for from Congress under the circumstances, but it would be nice if the federal code were something other than the product of a freshmen dorm-room bull session,” says Taylor. “High pump prices are not reducing demand because they are not imposing anything like the economic pain politicians allege.”

He also affirms that in 1972, defined as the “last year of energy innocence”, prices averaged 36 cents per gallon. Add inflation and it comes to an equivalent of $2.77 in today’s prices. Current prices might be high but not that far from the ones paid at the beginning of the year. He also affirms that “Politicians who think that the government should or, more importantly, can do something about gas prices are deluding themselves — recent federal action is lurching toward price controls, which is the stupidest, most ineffective policy option out there.”

He concludes that the war against “price gouging” might artificially lower prices but “that will benefit the few who manage to buy gas before it’s all bought up. Right now supply-and-demand fairly determines the current — and fair — price of gasoline. It’s a law of economics that has been proven time and time again”.

Does that mean we can expect to pay even more at the gas-pump? Then maybe if we all used more efficient vehicles, demand would go down and prices would be cheaper?

[Source: Cato Institute]

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


BOLD MOVES: THE FUTURE OF FORD Step behind the curtain at Ford Motor. Experience the documentary first-hand.

Grid Alternatives: Learn How to Install Solar Panels For Free (Pt. 2)

GRID AlternativesPhoto Credit: GRID AlternativesAs you may remember from my previous post, Grid Alternatives is a Bay Area non-profit that teaches volunteers how to install solar panels while helping low income residents cut costs on installing a new solar system for their home.

This weekend I took the plunge and found myself standing on top of a roof, where I discovered there are many steps involved in a solar installation, only the last of which involves the panels.

When we arrived, the team leaders quickly divivded us up into a ground team and a roof team and then launched right into the project. While the ground team stayed below to size up the inverter and electrical circuits, the rest of us went up to the roof to learn how to set the feet and tracking system that support the rooftop panels.

I quickly learned that setting the feet can be a messy process. Applying tar to secure the feet and to stop up any potential roof leaks, I soon had tar all over my pants, hands, feet, and even in my hair… Luckily, the Grid Alternatives team came prepared with some biodeisel to clean all it off and I was soon reabsorbed in the next steps of aligning the tracking and testing the efficiency percentage of each panel.

The teams were an interesting mix of Grid Alternatives veterans and newcomers, and it quickly became apparent why people get hooked on volunteering for installs with Grid Alternatives: not only were the team leaders easy-going and interested in sharing their seasoned knowledge, the other volunteers were also quick to exchange practical and scientific experience with the those who didn’t have as much familiarity with the solar realm.

All in all, it’s safe to say I’m officially hooked. Learning how to install solar panels (for free!) was one of the easiest and most fun ways to spend my Saturday, and I would do it again in a heartbeat. If you’re interested in signing up for a training and an install day, check out www.gridalternatives.org, and I will probably see you there.

Vatican Goes Solar

People of faith from around the globe are taking the lead on global warming solutions. Following on the heels of an alliance among some U.S. faith leaders to fight global warming, the Vatican has announced plans to install a giant solar power system.

The 1,000 solar panels will adorn the football-sized roof of the Paul VI audience hall, one of the top energy guzzlers in the sovereign city state. The solar system will be able to provide all the heating, cooling, and lighting needs of the entire building year-round, and any extra electricity generated will be fed back into the Vatican’s grid.

Pier Carlo Cuscianna, head of the Vatican’s department of technical services and mastermind of the project, was inspired by the calls of Pope Benedict XVI and Pope John Paul II to treat the planet with respect and their warnings that global warming will effect the world’s poorest and most vulnerable people.

This isn’t the first time the Vatican has shown leadership on clean energy. In 1999, the entire lighting system of St. Peter’s Basilica was refurbished with energy-efficient lighting, which cut its energy consumption by about 40 percent.

Although Vatican City is not a signatory of the Kyoto Protocol, the Catholic News Service reports that this solar project marks “a major move” to reduce its carbon-footprint and move away from its dependence on Italy’s power grid.

CathNews
Catholic News Service

Vatican Goes Solar

People of faith from around the globe are taking the lead on global warming solutions. Following on the heels of an alliance among some U.S. faith leaders to fight global warming, the Vatican has announced plans to install a giant solar power system.

The 1,000 solar panels will adorn the football-sized roof of the Paul VI audience hall, one of the top energy guzzlers in the sovereign city state. The solar system will be able to provide all the heating, cooling, and lighting needs of the entire building year-round, and any extra electricity generated will be fed back into the Vatican’s grid.

Pier Carlo Cuscianna, head of the Vatican’s department of technical services and mastermind of the project, was inspired by the calls of Pope Benedict XVI and Pope John Paul II to treat the planet with respect and their warnings that global warming will effect the world’s poorest and most vulnerable people.

This isn’t the first time the Vatican has shown leadership on clean energy. In 1999, the entire lighting system of St. Peter’s Basilica was refurbished with energy-efficient lighting, which cut its energy consumption by about 40 percent.

Although Vatican City is not a signatory of the Kyoto Protocol, the Catholic News Service reports that this solar project marks “a major move” to reduce its carbon-footprint and move away from its dependence on Italy’s power grid.

CathNews
Catholic News Service

The Green Options Interview: Van Jones

Van Jones is the founder of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, a non-profit organization working to find solutions to "America’s two biggest problems: social inequality and environmental destruction."

The Ella Baker Center's Reclaim the Future campaign focuses on ensuring that jobs and job training are available for the poor and for people of color in the emerging green economy.

I spoke with Van at his office in Oakland on May 21. He had just returned from Washington D.C. where he testified before Congress about green collar jobs.

Green Options: The scope of your work and activism is extremely broad: civil rights, political activism, juvenile justice system reform… How does environmental activism fit in?

Van Jones: From my point of view, we have a legacy in Progressive politics in the last century of being very fragmented: single issue, sub-sub-sub-issue sometimes. We've worked harder and harder and gotten farther away from each other and from any real solutions. So, it's not about the environment fitting in.

I look at the world through certain lenses: race, class, gender, power. The environment is a lens: a way I look at the world. So I see the environment in everything. I see ecological perils and solutions in everything. It's not surprising that a society that has throwaway children and throwaway neighborhoods also has throwaway species and throwaway resources and throwaway continents. It's a throwaway mentality that we have.

What we do with people should be restorative. If somebody gets in trouble with the law, the goal should be a just outcome, and a just outcome should be one that leaves everybody else better off than they were before. That's not what we do. We have a retribution-based justice system. If somebody damages me, the system is going to damage them. You add damage to damage, and that's how we get justice. How do you know you have justice? Look, there's more damage! My view is that we need to have restorative justice where the victim has been made whole, the offender or the trespasser has been rehabilitated, and the community has been restored to some sense of wholeness. That's a much higher standard, but it's something to aim for.

I feel the same thing about the suicide economy that we're in. You take a bunch of living things, turn them into dead things, shrink wrap it, and that's your economic growth model. I think that's totally nuts. We should be restoring and replenishing the capacity of nature to take care of us. That should be how we grow: green growth. My hope is that someday we'll have restorative justice and we'll have restorative economics.

There's only one solution to all the problems, or to at least 80 percent of the problems we have in this country, and that's a green economy strong enough to lift people out of poverty.

GO: You use the terms "eco-apocalypse", "eco-apartheid", and "eco-equity" to describe possible future societal outcomes from an environmental perspective. What do those terms mean to you?

VJ: Eco-apocalypse is the natural outcome of how we're living. You've got six billion people, soon to be nine billion people, and everybody's eager to ride around in an S.U.V. while chugging on a Slurpee, or they wish they were! And that's just not gonna work. The outcome of that kind of lifestyle and value system is eco-apocalypse.

Eco-apartheid is the danger that certain elites, certain ecological haves, begin to think they've solved the problem because they've solved it for themselves. But the problem is actually getting worse and worse everywhere else around them. The ecological have-nots not only continue to suffer morally and physically, but also, that particular moment [when the elites think they've solved the problem] just becomes a speed bump on the way to eco-apocalypse anyway.

To me, eco-equity is a way of talking about an ecologically sustainable society that is more just, more fair, more equal, and more inclusive than the one we have now.

GO: And that's why you created the Oakland Green Jobs Corps? What is your goal with that project?

VJ: We've created the process by which it's being born. We want to train up a bunch of urban youth in green enterprise. People are always telling me, "Oh Van, you just want to make these guys be the workers and the slaves. A green plantation!" But, you know, I'm a good southern Christian guy. I'm for work. It should be paid fairly and it should be safe and clean and it shouldn't be hurting the earth and everybody around you.

I want to see green career paths, where people get a chance to start at the bottom and then step up to the next rung on the ladder and then the next rung, and get a chance to become co-owners and co-investors and co-inventors. It has to start some place.

Our point of view is, lets not be so elitist that we can't honor good, hard, dignified, ennobling work: people working with their hands, building things, putting up solar panels, weatherizing homes, working on organic agriculture, building wind farms. We don't have robots in society, so somebody has to do that work. Lets make sure that the people who can use that work get a chance to do it. I see that as a first step toward bigger and better things.

Our big problem in this country: everybody wants people to climb out of poverty themselves. I'm for that. But they want people to climb a six story ladder with four rungs on it. Lets put some rungs on this ladder, and lets make sure that ladder is pointing toward the green economy and not the grey economy.

GO: You had the opportunity to testify before Congress about green collar jobs just a few days ago. How did that opportunity come about, and what did you have to say?

VJ: It was one of the happiest days of my life. I'll put it in the top five. It was like a movie! You put your suit on and get your shoes polished and get in the cab to go over to the big building with high ceilings and marble floors. Then you sit in front of this little table with three other people. The Congresspeople all walk in, and they sit up there like they're gods. They give their speeches, and then it's your turn, and you get a chance to talk to people who, if they believe you, can vote to send hundreds of millions of dollars to your constituency. And… it was just great.

I got a chance to say everything I had to say. Representative [Edward] Markey and Representative Hilda Solis, their comments were… I was thinking, "We should put that on our website!" They were saying things we've been saying. That was really cool: to see people in powerful positions like that saying "green pathways out of poverty" and "green collar jobs". That's stuff that the Ella Baker Center was saying in 2004 and 2005 when it was really novel. People hadn't really thought about that before. Now we've gotten to a place where people in high office feel like they can say it in public and nobody's going to laugh. That's a big change.

The opportunity came [to testify] because we were just doing our work and somebody from [Speaker of the House Nancy] Pelosi's office heard about it. They called us in and asked some questions. We were clearly being vetted in a way. The next time they called us over, the Speaker was actually there. We got a chance to be in a meeting with her, and then did a press conference. So, basically, we ended up with about $5 million worth of free lobbying just doing this work here in Oakland and believing in it, and because we're just a stone's throw from the Speaker's home office.

It was weird to me because it was like being back in high school civics. It was like, [sings] "I'm just a bill. Yes, I'm only a bill." An idea comes from the people, then a representative introduces it and it becomes law. I'm thinking, "This is starting to get corny!" And I'm right in the middle of it!

GO: Do you have any interest in someday running for office yourself?

VJ: No. No. Not at all. I'm totally excited and fascinated by politics and politicians. I listen to NPR and Rush Limbaugh. I'm a big political junkie. Thus, I know better than to run for office. [Laughs]

GO: What are the most important things that individuals and individual businesses can do to ensure that green collar jobs and eco-equity become realities?

VJ: I wish it was easy. Just say, "Hire urban youth." I wish it was that easy, but it's not that easy. Our public schools and our foster care system and our juvenile court system have so failed a generation of urban youth that some of them are not job ready. We may as well be honest about that.

What is possible is to identify those community-based organizations that work with young people. Those community colleges. Go out of your way to find those helping themselves to get job ready. You probably cant do it by posting on your individual website, "We have a job." You're going to have to go out of your way a little bit to identify community-based organizations or churches and say, "Look, if you have any young people who are job ready or close to it, let me know." It does take extra work. You do have to go out of your way. But every community has reputable community centers, reputable pastors, who can help you navigate that and help you find people who will do a good job.

If you want to go a step beyond that, every county has some kind of a workforce investment board or has job training available. Usually it's through the community colleges and vocational schools. Go to the local community college and say to them, listen, this is what we're doing: if you train people in solar installation or in some other particular thing I'm doing, I will hire three or four people in the next year from your program. That's all you have to say to a community college. They will turn on a dime if they believe they can get their graduates jobs.

Unfortunately, it's the polluters and the despoilers and the big-box stores that dictate what a kid can learn in a community college. It's just one section of the business community, frankly the worst section, in industries that are mature enough that can actually dictate, "We want XYZ employees." Most eco-entrepreneurs, they're hiring their dorm buddies to do vocational work, because they're so disconnected from traditional blue collar communities.

So, minimally, reach out to those community groups that are reputable. And it may take you a few times. Don't give up based on the first setback. You may hire somebody that doesn't work out. It's okay to hire, it's okay to fire, and it's okay to try to hire again. That success story is one hire away. You don't give up because this one didn't work out. You don't do that for anyone else. You never say as a business person, "Well, I'm never going to hire another college graduate! That one was a fool!"

GO: You named the Ella Baker Center after an "unsung civil rights heroine." Who are some of the Ella Bakers of the environmental movement?

VJ: You gotta start with Ken Saro-Wiwa, who was murdered by Shell and Nigerian activists. You can never honor him enough in terms of the commitment he made to the Ogoni people and his willingness to work across so many different boundaries. He put the Ogoni people on the map and Nigeria on the map and Shell on the map. And the price he paid [was] being murdered by the government with the duplicity of big corporate America.

Vivian Chang here in Oakland's Chinatown. About to become a mom, in her thirties, never seeks the spotlight. But, you go over to an event at the Asian Pacific Environmental Network, there are nine different Asian nationalities there. She's doing the real work.

I love Juliet Ellis at Urban Habitat. She's just so smart and fast and able to deal with these big white bankers and also able to deal with these low-income organizers, and is impressive within herself all the time.

Majora Carter in the South Bronx, who's becoming a sung hero! [Laughs] She got the MacArthur [Fellowship], but she should get the MacArthur and the Nobel Prize and whatever else they've got.

We're really lucky to have such a strong and growing environmental movement in the country. I love Billy Parish with Energy Action. He's willing to try to figure out how to get all those wonderful white kids working together, and he's wanting to figure out how to connect with other struggles. I don't know if he's sung or unsung, but I'd add him to my list. Keep it diverse. [Laughs]

But, Julia Butterfly [Hill] is always at the top of my list. She's sung certainly well enough by now, but that's my girl. Julia Butterfly, in my life, will always be my number one through ten.

Defending Whales: The Greenpeace statement to the International Whaling Commission in Anchorage

Posted by Dave (in Anchorage, Alaska)

_MG_1674_welcome_iwc_430.jpg

Now, I wouldn’t normally do this – but I reckon that this statement has a fair whack of power to it, and states exactly what Greenpeace wants from the International Whaling Commission – Dave

Greenpeace Opening Statement

International Whaling Commission 59

28 May, 2007

Anchorage, Alaska

We are pleased to be in Anchorage to observe the 59th annual meeting of the IWC and hope that the near continuous daylight will inspire and invigorate those who wish to modernise the IWC for its necessary role in the 21st century.

To make this possible, the relentless drive to resume commercial whaling must end. Commercial whaling brings no conservation benefits to whales or the oceans whatsoever. It has no role to play in the world economy or sustainable development and poverty alleviation. But while the IWC is distracted by an increasingly polarized debate over commercial whaling, some whale populations are slipping towards extinction.

Continue reading The Greenpeace statement to the International Whaling Commission in Anchorage…