Overwhelmed by Green Fatigue? It’s Time to Ask Why.

Before we kick off summer with Memorial Day barbeques this weekend, it’s important to remember Spring 2007 was when the incubating third wave of environmentalism finally hatched in pop culture.

If you passed by any newsstand in April magazines from Elle to Sports Illustrated had green issues giving quick tips and tricks on how we could play our part. TV got in on “doing good” in May with the amazing Planet Earth, Sundance Channel’s The Green and even American Idol’s own charity-themed show. Just as our heartstrings and conscious seem to have been pulled enough, companies are declaring their greenness in droves.

Where does this leave ordinary people whom just want to go about their lives, avoid cancer and feel like responsible citizens? It should leave us hyper aware and charged up to change the world. For some “conscious consumers”, it does. For the rest of us, it might make us replace a few light bulbs and recycle more frequently, but it will ultimately leave us overwhelmed by green clutter and ready to give up.

If you are part of this group, you probably are enduring “Green Fatigue”. The whole idea of green fatigue comes from the world of consumer electronics. As James Surowiecki points out in next week’s New Yorker, when we buy cell phones, cameras or even toasters these days, we are often seduced by choice and information but in practice prefer simplicity:

When the subjects were given the chance to customize their product, choosing from twenty-five features, they behaved like kids in a candy store. (Twenty features was the average.) But, when they were asked to use the digital device, so-called “feature fatigue” set in. They became frustrated with the plethora of options they had created, and ended up happier with a simpler product.

With all the buzz around going green, it seems like a million options exist whether its organic cotton or hemp clothes, local organic foods, energy efficient light bulbs or hybrid vehicles. Frankly we can’t necessarily afford to take all of them now. Even if we did, we wouldn’t necessarily have the carbon footprint of an eco acetic.

So what’s the answer? Whether it’s technology or greening our lives, we feel overwhelmed when we stop asking why and start accepting everything we’ve been told. However, simplicity requires being able to decipher what’s worth hearing. It requires looking to the plethora of green products and services and asking why. Why is one option necessary or better than another? Why is the process for consuming something the way it is? Why doesn’t a service exist?

Now this might seem silly. But it takes five minutes to send a clever email, and the processes can be empowering. I’ve found in writing The Eightfold that asking questions can often reveal more about a company than I ever expected. For example, I recently emailed Apple regarding its environmental policy after a visit to the SOHO store. That day was particularly hot and the air conditioning was on with the doors open.

While I understand this is standard retail practice, it still seemed like a terrible waste of energy. I emailed the store manager and was told it wouldn’t happen again. Still he hadn’t told me why it happened in the first place. So, I emailed Apple’s corporate headquarters and followed up with two phone calls. It’s been a month, and I’ve not received a response.

My lesson? Apple may make environmental statements when Greenpeace twists its arm, but that doesn’t mean it’s ready or is able to explain them to consumers willing to ask why. If I ever was overwhelmed by green proclamations I now know how far Apple is willing to go to defend its position – not very.

The point here isn’t to attack Apple. It’s to demonstrate that we no longer have to accept green marketing at face value. Companies will not necessarily provide the perfect green solution, but good green companies should be willing if not enthusiastic and passionate to share their thoughts and hear your ideas. Once you start asking why, you will quickly be able to cut through the clutter to find your personal green pathway to a simply green clutter-free world.

New Yorker on Feature Creep

The Eightfold Apple Experience

The Clean Hub: Green Design Solving Real-World Problems

Green Hub Concept by Shelter Architecture
Green Hub Concept by Shelter ArchitectureGreen design at its finest is not only sustainable, but low-cost, beautiful, useful, and maybe even life-saving. Combining urban renewal, social action, and green architecture is the Clean Hub.

This portable, self-powered water and sanitation station has many sustainable features, including a composting toilet, rainwater collection and filtration system, and solar panels that, along with a battery, provide all the power the Clean Hub needs and then some. The idea came from folks at Shelter Architecture, but thanks to architecture and design students at the University of Minnesota, it will soon be put to use in New Orleans, where it will be the centerpiece of a community that will foster sustainable growth.

John Dwyer from Shelter Architecture, who also led the students in designing a prototype of the Clean Hub, describes the project:

Shelter developed the idea through a 2 year research and development process. We then brought it in to a studio to allow students to design and build a real world application of it.

The hub is totally off-grid, generating its own water through rain water collection, it's own electricity through photovoltaics, and its own sanitation through composting toilets and gray water irrigation.

The first prototype heads to a learning garden in the hardest hit area of New Orleans on June 21st, the summer solstice.

The architecture students at the University of Minnesota took the concept and ran with it, creating a low-cost solution based on a used storage container that can be easily transported to disaster-stricken areas to provide necessary infrastructure. It was built using recycled and donated parts, lots of elbow grease, and a green vision. The Clean Hub is a simple solution to a complex and common problem that is certainly more practical and sustainable than what FEMA currently uses!

The Clean Hub will be sent to the Lower Ninth Ward in New Orleans, and will serve as a building block to a sustainable rebuilding effort supported by many local organizations. A community garden, farmer's market, and public gathering space will eventually surround it, leading to urban renewal with sustainability in mind.

Hopefully with the success of the Clean Hub in New Orleans, the idea can be continued to help provide water, sanitation, and renewable energy wherever it is needed around the globe. The design was created with urban slums and refugee camps in mind, both possible future homes of the Clean Hub.

This design encompasses cradle-to-cradle thinking, sustainable development, poverty relief, and community building as well as green design. It's not every day that architecture is used to save the planet and help the poor, but the Clean Hub was an opportunity for architecture professionals and students to do just that.

Congress Investigates Smithsonian “Toning Down” Global Warming

Earlier this spring, U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi created the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming. Although it has no legislative-making power, it can study and make recommendations on the problem. This week it took on an American icon: the Smithsonian Institution.

The Committee is investigating allegations by former associate director of the National Museum of Natural History, Robert Sullivan, that Smithsonian officials toned down a climate change exhibit to avoid angering some members of Congress and the Bush administration.

Sullivan charges that the exhibit’s text was rewritten to make the connection between climate change and human activity more uncertain. The Smithsonian has denied the allegations, pointing out that Sullivan “was neither a scientists nor a curator.” Other scientists and curators have said that nothing major was omitted, although some admitted to political sensitivities. John Calder, a lead climate scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration told the Associated Press:

"I remember them telling me there was an attempt to make sure there was nothing in there that would be upsetting to any politicians. They're not stupid. They don't want to upset the people who pay them."

The Natural Resources Defense Council had considered co-sponsoring the climate change exhibit but objected to the exhibit's text about uncertainties on the future warming of the planet.

Associated Press, via Examiner.com

London’s Trafalgar Square Gets A Living Green Carpet

Trafalgar Square in London is not known for its green credentials. For those of us that have walked its open expanse, there's very little organic material beyond the gum stuck to your shoe to tred on. Being a large intersection of foot traffic, it's naturally a stone and concrete affair. Starting today and continuing until tomorrow, however, Trafalgar Square is getting a green makeover.

Over 2,000 square meters of living turf will be placed in the square transforming the icon into London's "Village Green". For two days, people are encouraged to take advantage of the living space with picnics and other recreational activities. The turf itself comes from a company outside of York called Lindum that specializes in sustainable grass growing practices. The turf is harvested as a vegetative mat of roots and leafy plant with very little soil attached. One of the main fertilisers is an organic material made from recycled waste from Yorkshire Water.

After its use on the square, the turf will be moved to Bishops Park in Hammersmith and Fulham, where it will be planted beneath "an avenue of majestic plane trees close to the River Thames and Fulham Palace."

Personally, I love this idea. The concept of taking urban areas generally devoid of natural beauty and adding something organic and grand is impressive. I think people in cities generally avoid nature; and in doing so, miss out on the connection that's needed for us to actually care about the big picture; to work in harmony with everything beyond our two bedroom pads. While these additions are temporary, one hopes that if such creations can inspire, then permanent solutions that offer a mix of urban and nature are not far ahead.

Did you get to Trafalgar this week? What did you think of its new look?

VisitLondon.com

Defending Whales: Northern Exposure, Episode I

Posted by Dave (in Anchorage, Alaska)

_MG_1683_downtown_anchorage.jpg

Greetings! The Whale Defenders team is starting to gather here in Anchorage for the International Whaling Commission meeting (IWC59). In fact, the meeting is already sort of underway – in private, scientific sessions. Next week sees the kick off of the public part of the meeting – and that’s when it gets interesting. Really interesting – this is the organisation, don’t forget, that’s supposed to decide on the fate or the world’s whales.

I’m currently sitting in the cosy little Greenpeace office in downtown Anchorage, with a view of Cook Inlet’s Knik Arm. Coupled with jet lag, the amount of daylight is bewildering – some 19 hours a day – even after spending February in the Antarctic, on board the Esperanza.

Up till this afternoon, the weather was dull and rainy – but the sun broke out, and the raincoats are now packed away. It’s now pretty warm, and Anchorage’s spectacular backdrop of mountains is visble from all sides. The city itself is small, walkable, very friendly, and right on the edge of a huge wilderness. I’ve taken an instant liking to the place,

Continue reading Northern Exposure, Episode I…

Defending Whales: Whales in New Delhi – India

Posted by Dave (in Anchorage, Alaska)

802E4072_india_430.jpg

A couple of days ago, activists, along with a big inflatable whale (Flo’s cousin?) visited the Japanese embassy in New Delhi, India, with the messaged “We Love Japan, not Whaling”.

The activists also delivered a message to Japan’s ambassador to India, H. E. Mr. Yasukuni Enoki, urging his government to put an end to whaling – whether it’s ‘scientific’ or commercial.

Continue reading Whales in New Delhi – India…

Using geoengineering to combat climate change?

Filed under: , ,

It seems that desperate times call for desperate measures. Even somewhat weird measures.

The first stage of actively battling global warming is already in effect. Researches aboard the Weatherbird II are sailing the ocean, seeding it with 600 tons of granulated iron ore. The purpose? Iron is a key nutrient for plankton. The sea creatures apparently also consume a lot of CO2, but have been dying off. The Enterprise’s Weatherbird II’s three-year mission is to help boost the plankton population.

Other steps include manufacturing thousands of artificial trees – basically large CO2 filters – to supplement our existing vegetation, as well as infusing our stratosphere with sulfur dioxide, simulating volcanic eruptions, blocking some of the sun’s rays. The real kicker to me is the plan to launch 16 trillion (yeah, that’s their real figure) “refractive shields” into orbit to shade the earth, each one being three feet wide. Right. Oh, and these 16 trillion shields would refract… wait for it… 2 percent of the sun’s rays. That certainly seems worth the effort and expense.

But in all seriousness, global warming is a real, serious, urgent problem. Any ideas on combating it are welcome and up for discussion at this point. So feel free to put your ideas in the comments. And your jokes.

[Source: Popular Mechanics via Instapundit]

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


BOLD MOVES: THE FUTURE OF FORD Step behind the curtain at Ford Motor. Experience the documentary first-hand.

Hubo-Way: A new Segway copy… uh, competitor?

Filed under: ,

While sales of the Segway are not exactly setting the world on fire or anything like that, one might find it odd that competitors would be springing up. We showed you a possible Sony Segway competitor a while back. And now we bring you the Hubo-Way, which is almost more of a copy of the Segway than anything else. One thing to think about is the high cost of the Segway. Could a device like the Segway sell more copies if it were priced lower? Possibly, but just how large of a market could there be for a device that is really only useful under a handful of scenarios? What I am getting at is that the Segway isn’t really a device that most people would consider commuting to work on, is it? I think that the Segway, and other possible competition for it, makes the most sense to business users. Moving around in a warehouse or delivering items in an urban setting might make the most sense; however, the design of the device seems to target the up-market crowd who has some extra spending cash. Could the market bear a lower cost alternative?

[Source: Engadget]

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


BOLD MOVES: THE FUTURE OF FORD Step behind the curtain at Ford Motor. Experience the documentary first-hand.